Problem 213: Flea Circus

(see projecteuler.net/problem=213)

A 30x30 grid of squares contains 900 fleas, initially one flea per square.
When a bell is rung, each flea jumps to an adjacent square at random (usually 4 possibilities, except for fleas on the edge of the grid or at the corners).

What is the expected number of unoccupied squares after 50 rings of the bell? Give your answer rounded to six decimal places.

My Algorithm

Assume there is a 3x2 with two fleas A and B:
A..
.B.

The probability land_{A,1}(x,y) of flea A to land on a certain square after one jump is:
00.50
0.500
Note: Flea A had 2 options when it started at square (1,2), therefore directions(1,2) = 100% / 2 = 50% = 0.5.

The probability land_{B,1}(x,y) of flea B to land on a certain square after one jump is:
00.3330
0.33300.333
Note: Flea B had 3 options when it started at square (2,1), therefore directions(2,1) = 100% / 3 = 33.3% = 0.333.

To find the probability of flea A to be NOT on a certain square I have to compute empty_{A,1}(x,y) = 1 - land_{A,1}(x,y):
10.51
0.511

And the same for flea B: empty_{B,1}(x,y) = 1 - land_{B,1}(x,y):
10.6661
0.66610.666

A square is empty is neither flea A nor flea B landed on it: empty_1(x,y) = empty_{A,1}(x,y) * empty_{B,1}(x,y):
10.3331
0.33310.666

So the expected total number of empty squares after one jump is sum{empty_1} = 1 + 0.333 + 1 + 0.333 + 1 + 0.666 = 4.333.
There were exactly four empty squares before the first jump but there are on average 4.333 empty squares after one jump (→ plus 0.333)
because it's possible that both fleas land on the same square, leaving five square empty instead of four.

In the second iteration, the probability land_{A,2}(x,y) of flea A depends on the probability of being on the square in the previous iteration, too.
The probabilities land_{A,2}(x,y) of flea A after two jumps are:
0.41600.166
00.416*0

Let's examine the square land_{A,2}(2,1) which is denoted by a star:
land_{A,2}(2,1) = land_{A,1}(2,2) * directions(2,2) + land_{A,1}(1,1) * directions(1,1) = 0.5 * 0.333 + 0.5 * 0.5 = 0.416.

Implementation


Initially all squares are empty, therefore empty[x][y] = 1.

Then my program tracks each a single flea (such as flea A or B) over 50 rounds.
It has a grid current which is intially zero and contains a single 1 at the start position of the flea.
After each jump, the probabilities of each square the flea can jump to are updated and stored in next.
If all squares are processed, next is copied to current.
After 50 rounds, the "emptiness" of each square is empty[x][y] *= 1 - current[x][y].

This process is repeated for all 30x30 fleas after which the sum of all squares in empty is the result.

Alternative Approaches

Even though the algorithm is pretty simple, I struggled with a few details and couldn't find the correct answer for a while.
Therefore I wrote a Monte-Carlo simulation "to get a feeling" for the result.
Obviously, the Monte-Carlo simulation wasn't able to compute an exact result, even after millions of repetitions.
But it helped me to spot my errors and fix them.

Note

The grid offers several opportunies to exploit symmetries.
I mirror along the x- and/or y-axis if possible (see #define FAST_SYMMETRY).
In the end I get a 3x speedup.

You could mirror along the diagonals, too, but then the code might get messy.

Interactive test

You can submit your own input to my program and it will be instantly processed at my server:

Input data (separated by spaces or newlines):
Note: Enter the width, height and number of jumps.

This is equivalent to
echo "3 2 1" | ./213

Output:

(please click 'Go !')

Note: the original problem's input 30 30 50 cannot be entered
because just copying results is a soft skill reserved for idiots.

(this interactive test is still under development, computations will be aborted after one second)

My code

… was written in C++11 and can be compiled with G++, Clang++, Visual C++. You can download it, too. Or just jump to my GitHub repository.

#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <vector>
 
// size of the flea circus
unsigned int width = 30;
unsigned int height = 30;
// number of jumps for each flea
unsigned int rounds = 50;
 
// a fixed 2D array
typedef std::vector<std::vector<double>> Grid;
// it looks weird, but the inner array describes the second index
 
// create a 2D (width x height) and set all elements to initialValue
Grid makeGrid(double initialValue)
{
Grid result(width);
for (auto& row : result)
row.resize(height, initialValue);
return result;
}
 
int main()
{
// read parameters
std::cin >> width >> height >> rounds;
 
// probability that squares are empty
// ==> no fleas yet, therefore "emptiness" probability is 1 (=100%) for each square
Grid empty = makeGrid(1);
 
// use symmetry to speed up the process
bool mirrorX = false;
bool mirrorY = false;
unsigned int maxX = width;
unsigned int maxY = height;
#define FAST_SYMMETRY
#ifdef FAST_SYMMETRY
if (width % 2 == 0)
{
mirrorX = true;
maxX = width / 2;
}
if (height % 2 == 0)
{
mirrorY = true;
maxY = height / 2;
}
#endif
 
// analyze each flea
for (unsigned int startX = 0; startX < maxX; startX++)
for (unsigned int startY = 0; startY < maxY; startY++)
{
// drop a single flea at (x,y):
// probability of seeing the flea is zero for each square ...
Grid current = makeGrid(0);
// ... except for the square where it starts
current[startX][startY] = 1;
 
// trace probability of landing at each square after a few rounds
for (unsigned int round = 0; round < rounds; round++)
{
// track probability of seeing the flea after one more jump
Grid next = makeGrid(0);
 
// look at each square from the previous round
for (unsigned int x = 0; x < width; x++)
for (unsigned int y = 0; y < height; y++)
{
// flea couldn't be there ? ==> skip
if (current[x][y] == 0)
continue;
 
// count number of possible destination squares
unsigned int directions = 4;
if (x == 0 || x == width - 1)
directions--;
if (y == 0 || y == height - 1)
directions--;
 
// probability of landing on a square is
// "probability of starting at current square" / "number of options"
double probability = current[x][y] / directions;
 
// add probability to each allowed destination square
if (x > 0)
next[x - 1][y] += probability;
if (x < width - 1)
next[x + 1][y] += probability;
if (y > 0)
next[x][y - 1] += probability;
if (y < height - 1)
next[x][y + 1] += probability;
}
 
current = std::move(next);
}
 
// 1. current[x][y] contains the probability that our flea is on square (x,y) after xx rounds
// 2. the probability of being empty is the opposite, it's: 1 - current[x][y]
// 3. and the probability that no flea finishes on that square (no matter where it started)
// is the product of the "emptiness" probabilities of all fleas
for (unsigned int x = 0; x < width; x++)
for (unsigned int y = 0; y < height; y++)
{
empty[x][y] *= 1 - current[x][y];
 
// use symmetries
if (mirrorX)
empty[x][y] *= 1 - current[width - 1 - x][y];
if (mirrorY)
empty[x][y] *= 1 - current[x][height - 1 - y];
if (mirrorX && mirrorY)
empty[x][y] *= 1 - current[width - 1 - x][height - 1 - y];
}
}
 
// sum of all probabilities
double result = 0;
for (unsigned int x = 0; x < width; x++)
for (unsigned int y = 0; y < height; y++)
result += empty[x][y];
 
// display result
std::cout << std::fixed << std::setprecision(6) << result << std::endl;
return 0;
}

This solution contains 17 empty lines, 28 comments and 6 preprocessor commands.

Benchmark

The correct solution to the original Project Euler problem was found in 0.05 seconds on an Intel® Core™ i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz.
(compiled for x86_64 / Linux, GCC flags: -O3 -march=native -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -std=gnu++11 -DORIGINAL)

See here for a comparison of all solutions.

Note: interactive tests run on a weaker (=slower) computer. Some interactive tests are compiled without -DORIGINAL.

Changelog

July 5, 2017 submitted solution
July 5, 2017 added comments

Difficulty

60% Project Euler ranks this problem at 60% (out of 100%).

Heatmap

Please click on a problem's number to open my solution to that problem:

green   solutions solve the original Project Euler problem and have a perfect score of 100% at Hackerrank, too
yellow solutions score less than 100% at Hackerrank (but still solve the original problem easily)
gray problems are already solved but I haven't published my solution yet
blue solutions are relevant for Project Euler only: there wasn't a Hackerrank version of it (at the time I solved it) or it differed too much
orange problems are solved but exceed the time limit of one minute or the memory limit of 256 MByte
red problems are not solved yet but I wrote a simulation to approximate the result or verified at least the given example - usually I sketched a few ideas, too
black problems are solved but access to the solution is blocked for a few days until the next problem is published
[new] the flashing problem is the one I solved most recently

I stopped working on Project Euler problems around the time they released 617.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75
76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125
126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150
151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175
176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200
201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225
226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275
276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300
301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325
326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350
351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375
376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400
401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425
426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450
451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475
476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500
501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525
526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550
551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575
576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600
601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625
626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650
651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675
676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700
701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725
726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750
751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775
776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800
801 802 803 804 805 806
The 310 solved problems (that's level 12) had an average difficulty of 32.6% at Project Euler and
I scored 13526 points (out of 15700 possible points, top rank was 17 out of ≈60000 in August 2017) at Hackerrank's Project Euler+.

My username at Project Euler is stephanbrumme while it's stbrumme at Hackerrank.

Look at my progress and performance pages to get more details.

more about me can be found on my homepage, especially in my coding blog.
some names mentioned on this site may be trademarks of their respective owners.
thanks to the KaTeX team for their great typesetting library !