<< problem 24 - Lexicographic permutations | Reciprocal cycles - problem 26 >> |

# Problem 25: 1000-digit Fibonacci number

(see projecteuler.net/problem=25)

The Fibonacci sequence is defined by the recurrence relation:

F_n = F_{n-1} + F_{n-2}, where F_1 = 1 and F_2 = 1.

Hence the first 12 terms will be:

F_1 = 1

F_2 = 1

F_3 = 2

F_4 = 3

F_5 = 5

F_6 = 8

F_7 = 13

F_8 = 21

F_9 = 34

F_{10} = 55

F_{11} = 89

F_{12} = 144

The 12th term, F_{12}, is the first term to contain three digits.

What is the index of the first term in the Fibonacci sequence to contain 1000 digits?

# Algorithm

I precompute all Fibonacci number with up to 5000 digits (a design decision influenced by Hackerrank's modified problem) and keep those results in `cache`

.

Unfortunately, there is a small problem with C++ ...

F_{47}=2971215073 is the largest Fibonacci number that fits in a 32-bit integer and

F_{94}=19740274219868223167 is too big for a 64-bit integer.

My program stores such large number as a `std::vector`

where index 0 contains the least significant digit ("in reverse order").

E.g. F_{23}=28657 is represented as `{ 7, 5, 6, 8, 2 }`

The function `add`

returns the sum of two large numbers `a`

and `b`

where `b>=a`

.

The algorithm behind this function is exactly the same you were taught in primary school.

## Alternative Approaches

The main problem was adding two very large numbers. When programming in Python, Java, etc. you get these things for free.

## Modifications by HackerRank

The large amount of test cases was the main cause for dividing my solution into two parts;

1. precompute all relevant Fibonacci numbers (done once - "expensive")

2. look up the result (performed many, many times - "cheap")

# My code

… was written in C++11 and can be compiled with G++, Clang++, Visual C++. You can download it, too.

#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
// store single digits because numbers get too big for C++

typedef std::vector<unsigned int> Digits;
// Hackerrank's upper limit

const unsigned int MaxDigits = 5000;
// add two long number where b >= a

Digits add(const Digits& a, const Digits& b)
{
Digits result = b;
unsigned int carry = 0;
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < result.size(); i++)
{
// "a" might have less digits than "b"
if (i < a.size())
result[i] += a[i];
// don't forget about the carry ...
result[i] += carry;
// handle overflow
if (result[i] >= 10)
{
carry = 1;
result[i] -= 10;
}
else
carry = 0;
}
// largest digit not overflowing ?
if (carry != 0)
result.push_back(carry);
return result;
}
int main()
{
// precompute number of steps we needed for each number of digits
// [number of digits] => [index of smallest Fibonacci number]
std::vector<unsigned int> cache = { 0, 1 }; // F_0 is undefined
cache.reserve(MaxDigits);
// f(1) = 1
Digits a = { 1 };
// f(2) = 1
Digits b = { 1 };
// we have predefined F_1 and F_2
unsigned int fiboIndex = 2;
while (cache.size() <= MaxDigits)
{
// next Fibonacci number
fiboIndex++;
auto next = add(a, b);
a = std::move(b);
b = std::move(next);
// digits of current Fibonacci number
auto numDigits = b.size();
// digits of the previously largest Fibonacci number
auto largestKnown = cache.size() - 1; // don't count the 0th element
// one more digit than before ?
if (largestKnown < numDigits)
cache.push_back(fiboIndex);
}
// simply look up the result
unsigned int tests;
std::cin >> tests;
while (tests--)
{
unsigned int numDigits;
std::cin >> numDigits;
std::cout << cache[numDigits] << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}

This solution contains 15 empty lines, 17 comments and 2 preprocessor commands.

# Interactive test

You can submit your own input to my program and it will be instantly processed at my server:

This is equivalent to`echo "1 3" | ./25`

Output:

*Note:* the original problem's input `1000`

__cannot__ be entered

because just copying results is a soft skill reserved for idiots.

*(this interactive test is still under development, computations will be aborted after one second)*

# Benchmark

The correct solution to the original Project Euler problem was found in 0.41 seconds on a Intel® Core™ i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz.

(compiled for x86_64 / Linux, GCC flags: `-O3 -march=native -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -std=c++11 -DORIGINAL`

)

See here for a comparison of all solutions.

**Note:** interactive tests run on a weaker (=slower) computer. Some interactive tests are compiled without `-DORIGINAL`

.

# Changelog

February 24, 2017 submitted solution

April 4, 2017 added comments

# Hackerrank

see https://www.hackerrank.com/contests/projecteuler/challenges/euler025

My code solves **4** out of **4** test cases (score: **100%**)

# Difficulty

Project Euler ranks this problem at **5%** (out of 100%).

Hackerrank describes this problem as **easy**.

*Note:*

Hackerrank has strict execution time limits (typically 2 seconds for C++ code) and often a much wider input range than the original problem.

In my opinion, Hackerrank's modified problems are usually a lot harder to solve. As a rule thumb: brute-force is never an option.

# Links

projecteuler.net/thread=25 - **the** best forum on the subject (*note:* you have to submit the correct solution first)

Code in various languages:

Python: www.mathblog.dk/project-euler-25-fibonacci-sequence-1000-digits/ (written by Kristian Edlund)

Haskell: github.com/nayuki/Project-Euler-solutions/blob/master/haskell/p025.hs (written by Nayuki)

Java: github.com/nayuki/Project-Euler-solutions/blob/master/java/p025.java (written by Nayuki)

Mathematica: github.com/nayuki/Project-Euler-solutions/blob/master/mathematica/p025.mathematica (written by Nayuki)

C: github.com/eagletmt/project-euler-c/blob/master/20-29/problem25.c (written by eagletmt)

Javascript: github.com/dsernst/ProjectEuler/blob/master/25 1000-digit Fibonacci number.js (written by David Ernst)

Scala: github.com/samskivert/euler-scala/blob/master/Euler025.scala (written by Michael Bayne)

# Heatmap

green problems solve the original Project Euler problem and have a perfect score of 100% at Hackerrank, too.

yellow problems score less than 100% at Hackerrank (but still solve the original problem).

gray problems are already solved but I haven't published my solution yet.

blue problems are solved and there wasn't a Hackerrank version of it at the time I solved it or I didn't care about it because it differed too much.

*Please click on a problem's number to open my solution to that problem:*

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |

26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 |

51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 |

76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 |

101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 |

126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 |

151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 |

176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 |

201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 |

226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 |

My username at Project Euler is

**stephanbrumme**while it's stbrumme at Hackerrank.

<< problem 24 - Lexicographic permutations | Reciprocal cycles - problem 26 >> |